🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 778+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(778 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$40​
$66.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck. No chips or cracks.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
plain Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck

Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck. No chips or cracks.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1468923

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Glasses

Original Price:$66.67 USD

Sale Price:$40 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 778 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck!
The Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck arrived in magnificent condition.
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
In daily use, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck works as described and it meets expectations.
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five Stars for Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck
From my experience, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck works fine and it meets expectations.
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Value for Money
The Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck arrived quickly enough.​
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest Purchase Ever
For the price, the Large Vintage Mid Century Viking Persimmon Duck performs as expected so it’s acceptable.